CENTRE for POLICY ANALYSIS

CENTRE for POLICY ANALYSIS

“Social progress can be measured by the social position of the female sex” - Karl Marx

OPINION


Elections and the Issue of Civil Liberties


Civil liberties and democratic rights organisations have for long been pointing to bit-by-bit dilution of our constitutional freedoms under successive governments since 1977. But the past five years, in particular, have witnessed horrendous crimes where life and liberties of people, especially of Muslims, women, dalits and adivasis have been targeted. Whereas the cohorts of the ruling Bhartiya Janata Party (BJP) have been shielded against threat of prosecution or indeed extended immunity. It is also worth remembering that the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act has been in operation for decades (60 years in Nagaland, 50 years in Manipur, 30 years in Jammu and Kashmir) and the situation remains far from normal and "disturbed".  

The National Security Act (NSA) has been used against victims of gau rakshaks (cow protectors), dalit activists and journalists. The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) has been wielded to silence people who speak up for the marginalised and oppressed. And the sedition law has been used to threaten anyone who critcises Prime Minister Narendra Modi or his government. Therefore, it is important to see in these elections what political parties have to say about civil liberties.  

Admittedly, the manifestos of key political parties had come to lose their meaning and there was scepticism over their sincerity in pursuing the commitments made therein. But elections for 17th Lok Sabha appear to be heralding the re-emergence of manifestos.  

In the context of BJP playing fast and loose with the Constitution by protecting and mainstreaming lynchers, mobsters, and vigilantes, while going full throttle against dissidents and dissent, most manifestos are trying to make a difference by shifting the nature of political discourse that has hit an all-time low under BJP rule. The past five years of BJP rule are marked by relentless attacks on our constitutional freedoms. Thus, the BJP does not have anything to offer on civil liberties. Indeed, if one goes by what Union Home Minister Rajnath Singh did say the other day that if BJP returns to power, they would make the sedition law more stringent. This, when the Law Commission appointed by the BJP-led Government has itself called for its repeal.  

In 1977, all political parties, barring Congress, had opposed the Emergency and promised to restore democracy and constitutional freedoms of people. While much water has flowed since then, and many a commitment has fallen by the wayside, there is once again seems great enthusiasm among parties today on issues such as civil liberties, which are getting trampled in the name of national security/national interest.  

It is worth noting that BJP's manifesto, which seeks to exploit the fear of Pakistan and terrorism, and promises a hard line on national security, came a cropper the very day it was released. On April 3, Jammu & Kashmir's non-representative administration issued a decree banning civilian traffic on the national highway on Sunday and Wednesday and declared these two-days as dedicated to military convoys. The ban came into effect on April 7, and the very next day, the Army, Border Security Forces and the Central Reserve Police Force were plying their vehicles along with civilian traffic, thus making a mincemeat of the order issued at the behest of New Delhi, that too without consulting the Army and ignoring their "informal" advice that such an order "is not possible to implement". When the government is unable to even consult the Army, BSF and CRPF on convoys, the BJP's manifesto spouting national security seems hollow.  

Also, the BJP has committed itself to abrogation of Article 370 and annulling Article 35A. The 48-page manifesto resonates with illiberal and un-constitutional provisions in line with its jingoist perspective on national security. They have also committed themselves to amend the Citizenship Act to bring in religion as a criterion for citizenship and complete the National Register of Citizens. But, there is not a single word on protection and respect for civil liberties. In other words, BJP has made it clear that it doesn't care about upholding the Constitution, let alone live up to the promises made by the Constituent Assembly or the Freedom Movement, because it is committed to do away with the Constitution, which its mentor, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) has been opposing for decades.  

Against this anti-constitutional stance of the BJP, and in light of the all-round degradation of Indian democracy under their five-year rule, the manifestos of Congress and Communist Party of India (Marxist) stand out in contrast. True, Congress principally has a lot to answer for legislating and using draconian provisions against dissent or for framing laws that legitimise coercion. It also has a lot to answer for creating a political climate in which Right-wing extremists thrived and Left and democratic forces came under attack. Also, Congress was responsible for the Emergency in 1975, whereas CPI(M) and others have spoken up for restoration of democracy and protection of civil liberties. The CPI(M), after coming to power in 1977 in West Bengal, released all political prisoners but has used the law against a section of dissidents. Precisely, therefore, their manifesto on these issues is significant. In the past five years, Left parties in particular, as well as Congress, have lent support and have been out there on the streets against attacks on dissent, dissidents and in defence of democratic rights of people. The depth of their commitment to civil liberties will get tested even more, because Indians find themselves in the midst of a difficult and disturbing phase.  

Take CPI(M)'s manifesto where, in a section titled "In Defence of Constitutional and Democratic Rights", it promises to repeal the sedition law (S124A of the Indian Penal Code); repeal AFSPA and replace it with a new legal instrument that would provide a legal framework for the operations of the armed forces without draconian provisions; repeal or amend the NSA and UAPA; repeal of S499 of IPC on defamation; ratify the UN Convention Against Torture and of doing away with death penalty. All this is welcome because promising repeal of AFSPA marks a continuity with their stance in Tripura from where it was withdrawn when they were in power. Moreover, by asking for repeal or review of UAPA, which had been used in the past by the Left Front government in West Bengal, also shows that the party has unequivocally come out in defence of constitutional freedoms.  

Equally promising is their espousal of "maximum autonomy" for J&K based on Article 370 along with regional autonomy for Ladakh. This must be placed against the scenario where the BJP-led government treats Kashmiri Muslims as second-class citizens, if not 'enemies', to be suppressed. Although the million-dollar question is how that hollowed out autonomy can be restored to its original essence. The point is that it at least shows that another narrative and another course is possible in J&K that dispenses with the muscular approach.  

The CPI (ML) Liberation, too, in its manifesto devotes para 19 to "reform to protect civil liberties and democratic rights" where they commit themselves among other things to scrap a number of draconian laws such as on sedition, criminal defamation, UAPA, NSA, AFSPA; a Supreme Court-monitored tribunal on custodial torture and killings; making the National Investigation Agency and Intelligence Bureau accountable to Parliament; updating the jail manual; ending militarisation of civilian areas in J&K; and doing away with detention camps for "suspected illegal immigrants".  

The Congress manifesto is more remarkable given their long history of eroding or curtailing constitutional freedoms. So, for INC to come out forcefully in favour of civil liberties is a politically significant commitment against which their performance will be judged. In para 30 of its manifesto titled "Review of Laws, Rules & Regulations" , Congress says that India is "over-legislated and over-regulated country" and promises to: (a) Repeal laws outdated/unjust or unreasonably restricts freedoms; (b) Amend instruments to bring them in accord with Constitutional values; and (c) Codify and reduce them to ease compliance burden on citizens. And promises to omit S499 of IPC to make defamation a civil offence; omit sedition i.e. S 124A; amend laws which allow for detention without trial; amend/review AFSPA to remove immunity for crimes such as enforced disappearance, sexual violence and torture; amend laws to restructure every investigating agency's power to search, seize, attach, summon, interrogate and arrest in accordance with Constitution, Criminal Procedure Code and Indian Evidence Act.; amend IPC to make bail the rule and jail the exception; enact a law titled Prevention of Torture Act; and to release undertrials.  

Admittedly, only two out of three political parties whose manifesto focuses on civil liberties are currently represented in Parliament. And barring Congress, neither of the two Left parties are close to making their presence felt in Parliament. However, these three parties (along with Communist Party of India) did make their presence felt in the past five years in protest, dharnas, campaigns, offered resistance and lent their weight to civil society groups. It would have been good if CPI too had underlined the importance of civil liberties in its manifesto. However, even if few parties have taken a clear stance, this is a welcome expression of their commitment to civil liberties after a break of many decades. Especially, given past five years' experience at the hands of BJP. How this commitment will get translated into real time application in India is the next big challenge for all of us.    

OPINION

  • River in a 'Court of Law' - Legal issues pertaining to its personality
  • Syria: A Testament To International Moral Bankruptcy
  • When the State Sought to Muzzle Privacy, U-Turn Now Only to Accommodate SC Verdict
  • The Bull in A China Shop Wrecks Indian Economy
  • When Buddha Looks The Other Way: The Plight Of The Rohingya
  • A Fatal Blow to The Judiciary
  • The Dramatic Rise in Wealth Inequality
  • Wild And Baseless Speculations of Crisis in the CPI(M)
  • Budget 2018: Fantabulous Schemes With Not A Paisa Earmarked
  • Kasganj: Sankalp Foundation and the Politics of Hate
  • PM Modi Sounds the Election Bugle: Congress and Hindutva the Agenda for 2019 Polls
  • The US Game Plan in Syria
  • Both Nehru and Patel Were the Need of the Hour in 1947-48
  • The Battle of the Two Begums of Bangladesh
  • Why Bangladesh Matters
  • Kejriwal's Apology is Not What the Media Claims
  • Arrest of a '5-minute Dalits' Proves Why SC/ST Act Dilution Will Grossly Impact Real Dalits
  • The Dalits and the Law
  • Winners May Be Losers In Karnataka's Catch 22 Endgame
  • Jinnah and the BJP
  • Jawaharlal Nehru (Nov 14 1889- May 27, 1964): We Still Live In A House That Nehru Built
  • Implications of Trump-Kim Summit: Nuclear Pays!
  • Thomas Reuters Foundation Survey: Measuring Safety, Generating Outrage
  • ROADMAP TO A CEASEFIRE: AFGN - PAK
  • What Are People Voting for?
  • Foreign Policy: A Double Whammy Awaits India
  • Changing Discourse
  • Assam: The Mythology of "Immigrants"
  • Imran Time is Here
  • 71 Years on, Forsty Relations Countinue
  • To Stop Climate Change, We Need to Open Bordera
  • Make Use of Bid to Postpone Provincial Elections
  • Cringing and Fuddled at 71
  • Ensuring Strident Voice Will Not Become Majority Voice
  • Nehru, Vajpayee and Modi
  • Religious Bias Okayed
  • The Oslo Accords: A Bloody Legacy of Betrayal
  • Crushing the Campus
  • Three Stories And Task of The Office Of Missing Person
  • Drama Over Indo-Pak Meeting
  • An ill Wind
  • Symbolic Actions Alone Are Insufficient For Long Term Change To Occur
  • If Democracy Subverts Itself
  • Returning Land to Civilians is a Promise That Needs Follow Up
  • Democracy In Crisis: What we Know and What we Don't
  • Reparations Office Can Bind The Nations Together
  • Implementation Challenges Facing The Ayushman Bharat Program
  • Subverting the Central Bank
  • Under the Yoke of New-Imperialism: A Fake War of Patriotism and Treason
  • India Joins the Club
  • The Third Phase
  • President is Best Situated to Resolve Political Crisis
  • No Country for Adventure: Challenges Extreme Sports Athletes Face in India
  • Setting A Perilous Political Precedent
  • What Rahul and Modi can do in the Next Four Months
  • Finding a Win-Win Solution to Break the Deadlock
  • Temple in the Age of Colliders
  • Four Parameters of a Political Solution at This Time
  • Resolve National Question With President's Support
  • Decapitating the Leadership
  • Four Takeaways From the 2018 Election
  • Science of Words
  • The Ace up Modi's Sleeve
  • The Government Must Not Deny The TNA
  • The Prolonged Wait For Justice And For Political Leadership
  • Endgame in Afghanistan
  • Pluralist Ethos is More Relevant to National Identity
  • A Concerned Citizen's Points For Inclusion in The Manifesto of Political Parties
  • In My Own Voice: Circle of Unreason
  • RBI To The Rescue of Modi Government - It's Election Time!
  • Say No to War
  • A terrifying Fallout
  • The Type of Leadership The Country Needs
  • Death Wish as Nationalism
  • Politics on Kashmir Need Not be About Optics Alone
  • Why an Urban Job Guarantee Scheme is Not a Bad Idea
  • National Security: The New in 'New Normal'
  • Re-Promulgating an Ordinance is a Fraud on the Constitution
  • Elections 2019: India at a Crossroads
  • Peace and Inclusive Development
  • NYAY Providing Basic Income Fulfills the Vision of Mahatma Gandhi and Changed Election Narrative Based on Basic Issues
  • Advani Should Blame Himself For Promoting Modi
  • Kashmir: Tracing the Degeneration of Mainstream Politics
  • Elections and the Issue of Civil Liberties
  • Jumlanomics:Chronicles of a Post-Truth Bharat
  • BJP: Hiding Failures, Targeting Nehru
  • A Mayawati Moment
  • Godse is a Synonym of Hindu Nationalism, Agenda of the RSS Combine!
  • Development Beyond Numbers
  • A Rational Approach to Countering Extremist Violence is Needed
  • In My Own Voice: Is This the Sprit of Democracy?
  • Prevention is The Best Migration Cure
  • The Rise of Hate
  • The Right Mantras for India's Change
  • Coming Home - Where Family Overpowers All
  • Easter Sunday Bombing Used to Create a Major Rift in Sri Lankan Society
  • Hacking Humanity
  • Environmental Rule of Law in India
  • Peace is a Word That West Has Taken From Afghans
  • Trump's War Games
  • Modi & States
  • Who is an 'Outsider' in West Bengal?
  • China on Maps
  • 19th Amendment Will Correct Itself at End of President's Current Term
  • Authoritarianism and the Crisis of Public Ethics in India
  • Presidential Candidate The People Want
  • Has India's Kashmir Cape Given Pakistan Reason for War?
  • Icons and Ideology of Religious Nationalism
  • Why NRC in Assam May Create Another Kashmir
  • Campaign to Abolish the Executive Presidency in Sri Lanka is a Red Herring
  • As US Tries to Isolate Iran, China Steps In
  • Of Hindi and Hierarchy
  • Why Sri Lankan Elections May Bring Far Reaching Change
  • What US Policy Tells Us About India's Growing 'Friendship' With It
  • Gandhian Philosophy is a Critique of Modernity and Power
  • Inner Party Democracy is Just as Important as Funding
  • India's Foreign Policy Has Dug Itself a Deep Hole
  • 'Broken Promises' and Politics of Hate': Is Political Autonomy The Way Forward For J&K?
  • The Ninth Betrayal: America Has Let Down Khurd, Yet Again
  • Who Benefits From The WhatsApp Hacking Case?: Pertinent Question Left Unanswered
  • State Elections Results Expose "Limits" of BJP's Nationalist Agenda
  • "Religious Belief" vs. "Rule of Law": Did SC's Ayodhya Verdict Legalise Building of a Theocratic State?
  • What Does Trump's "New Refugee Ban" Mean for America's Immigrants?
  • India Must Change Course as Rajapaksas Return on Sinhala Buddhist Wave
  • The Supreme Court's First Judgment Without an Author
  • Geopolitics in South Asia Renders Millions Stateless
  • "Shakespeare's Vision of the Improbale" Unfolds: Is Modi Today's Macbeth?
  • Sri Lanka Under Rajapaksa: Finding Areas of Mutual Agreement
  • "The Game of Religion is Played by Men": Women Speak From the Margins of Ayodhya Dispute
  • Telangana Ecounter- Failure of Local Police Poses Grave Danger to Democracy
  • The Changing Nature of War and Diplomacy
  • Sri Lanka: Government's Cooperation A "Temporary Phenomenon"?
  • The Role of Corruption in This Season of Revolts
  • New Citizenship Law to a "Brazenly Divisive Agenda"
  • Youth Agitation Against CAA Brings a Historic Generational Shift
  • "Digital Authoritarianism": With Internet Shutdowns Normalised, the Digital Space is Democracy's New Battleground
  • Sri Lanka: The Challenge of Development Amidst Devolution of Power
  • The Political Divides that Split India
  • 'Never Again': Echoes of Nazi Crimes Remain Alive 75 Years After Auschwitz
  • "Legacy of Mutual Suspicion" Plagues Opponents of the Modi Regime
  • "Toxic" India Sliding into an Environmental Abyss
  • Manufacturing Hate: From Anurag Thakur's 'Shoot the Traitors' to Pistol-Bearing Youth's 'Yeh lo Azaadi!'
  • Kejriwal Isn't Communal, But His Desire Not to be Seen Anti-Hindu May Prove Self-Defeating
  • Religion States Won't Oppose US-Taliban Deal
  • Lessons From Pathogens: Coronavirus, A wake Up Call?
  • The Geopolitics of the Covid 19 Pandemic
  • Cold War Begins As Nations Fued Over Coronavirus
  • India Fights Coronavirus...With Scriptures, Morals and Police
  • The Burden of COVID 19
  • Do Israeli Settelemnts in Occupies West Bank Constitute a War Crime ?
  • The Global Debate on COVID-19 Lockdown: Listen to Divergent Scientific Voices or Risk Manipulation by Big Businesses?
  • Sri Lanka's Easter Bombings And The Demand For Justice
  • How India Can Solve the "Catch-22 Situation" of Allowing Migrant Workers to Return Home
  • The Time for Universal Basic Income Has Arrived
  • COVID-19 Crisis Exposes Fatal Weaknesses of 'Strong' Leaders
  • The Pandemic Has Taught Us the Importance of Maintaining an Ecological Balance, Will we Remember IT?
  • The Muslim Elite Has Let Down the Muslim Poor
  • "There is Nothing Nationalist or Non-Nationalist in Reporting"
  • Why WHO Took 3 Months to Declare a Global Pandemic
  • A Political Lockdown That Silences Voices
  • The 'Relief Package' of Online Education May End up "Institutionalising Drop Outs"
  • Can Democracy Survive the Coronavirus?
  • As China Ups the Ante, This is What India Must do...
  • Tackling Racism With Compassionate Reporting-CNN Leads The Way
  • Sri Lanka: Pluralism In Governance Required In The Absence of Parliament
  • Idia's Tactical Non-Solutions To China's Incursions in Ladakh
  • "At The Brink of A New Cold War": Sino-US Ties at a Crossroads
  • In Light of Rising Conservatism, Can The Personal be Political Again?
  • India-China: The Complete Breakdown of Trust, How and Why
  • Rethinking Development After Covid-19
  • The Pandemic Must Transform Our Agriculture
  • Treacherous Road to Make Manu History
  • The 'American Way of War' Is Built On A Foundation of Racism
  • Covid -19 And The Crisis of Education-An Insight
  • Governments That Preach Non-Violence Must Lead By Example
  • New Status of Hagia Sophia Signals The Death Of Secularism
  • Covid 19 and Furthering of Sectarian Agenda in Education
  • Biden's "Conventional" Approach vs Trump's "Whimsical" Handling of Foreign Policy
  • Why Arguments Against Reservation are Flawed
  • Curfew Welcomes One Year of Abrogations in Kashmir
  • Ayodha: What is BJP's Motive For Holding Ram Temple Ceremony Amid Pandemic?
  • New Education Policies of India And Pakistan Will Further Divide, Within and Without
  • Does India's Handling of China Make Sense?
  • Return of the Rajapaksas in Sri Lanka
  • An Independent Supreme Court Is a Must for Democracy
  • Does Rule of Law Trump Tide of Public Opinion?
  • UAE-Israel Deal Accelerating Fragmentation of West Asian Politics
  • Congress And Its "Unprecedented Political Challenge""
  • Does The 20th Amendment Threaten Pluralism in Sri Lanka?
  • Digital Hate, Now A Profitable Commodity
  • Rising Cases, Unemployment: Is India Ignoring Fears Stoked by the Pandemic?
  • Surging Pandemic, Slumping Economy - And the Crisis of Democracy
  • Anxious Leader, Passive Citizens and "Criminalised" Governance
  • Parliamentary Session Merely A "Notice Board" For Government Decisions?
  • The Collapse of Democratic Institutions Under Majoritarian Rule
  • Mughal MUseum Rekindles Question of India's "Slavery""
  • Babri Masjid Demolition Case: Court Ignored Findings of Liberhan Commission
  • As Politics of Hate Takes Over, The Biggest Casualty is Compassion
  • Hathras: The Last Opportunity to Reflect
  • India Joining Ranks of Illiberal Democracies
  • Rising Uncertainties May Lead to Election Chaos in The us
  • 'Secularism': A Dirty Word
  • Is Bihar Tired of Nitish Kumar Rule?
  • In Crisis: India Now A 'Pale Shadow of Former Self'
  • Economy VS. People: Differences Between US and China's Response to Covid-19
  • Trupm is Gone But Trumpian Populism Lives on
  • Bihar's Silent Voters: Explaining the BJP-JDU Alliance
  • How Many X-Factors Can an Election Take? Many, it Seems
  • Objectivity and Fascism
  • Is The Saudi Kingdom Moving Towards Recognising Israel?
  • Asaduddin Owaisi: An 'Exasperating Opponent' For Right,Left, And Centre
  •