Drowning Nation Clutches at Military Might?
Tikender Singh Panwar
On January 26, 2020, another
Republic Day was observed in the country with much fanfare. This, however, was
marked by a stark binary – the government's official functions, and the
people's functions of resistance and that of reclaiming the Constitution with
the ethos of a secular democratic republic.
I remember, in one of the
Republic Day parades' in Shimla, a senior bureaucrat of the Himachal
government, seated next to me, had whispered in my ears, "This will be a relic
of the past!" By 'this', he meant the military prowess and might that we
exhibit every year on the Republic Day parade, invariably in all the state
capitals in the country, including the central parade at the Rajpath, New Delhi.
I did not want to disagree with him and nodded my head.
For, some of the
nation-states-after prolonged fight and war amongst themselves-realised the
futility and even de-commissioned their military. The Scandinavians and the
Dutch, who fought for centuries together, have actually reduced their armies
substantially. Today, to even imagine decommissioning our armies in the South
Asian hemisphere, or here in India may sound blasphemous.
Republic Day has re-affirmed
that our territorial integrity is very safe because we have a strong army
commissioned. The sheer display of the defence forces is a reminder to that. So
would our neighbours feel, who have been exhibiting in their own capacities.
Just a look at the defence
expenditure of some of the South Asian States would prove the massive amount
being spent on securing our region's security. The Indian government has a
budget of US $60.9 billion (Rs 4.31 lakh crore), Pakistan has a budget of $11.4
billion, Bangladesh- $3.87 billion and China has a defence budget of $177.61
billion. In such a scenario, any reduction in the militarisation by any of the
neighbouring countries is not expected.
In the period from 2010 to 2018,
China, India and Pakistan figured in the list of top 10 largest importers of
arms and ammunition in the world. China spent US $1,566 million, India $1,539
million and Pakistan $777 million in the aforesaid period in buying arms. The
major gains in this military expenditure are made by the developed nations who
manufacture arms and then sell them to India and other neighbouring countries.
The top five suppliers of arms to the world, including the countries of South
Asia, are the US, UK, Germany, France and Russia. US exports 682,607 billion
TIV (trend indicator values based on the known unit production costs of weapons
and transfer of military resources), UK-141,385 billion TIV; Russia-140,057
billion TIV, France-122,558 billion TIV and Germany- 86,740 billion TIV.
The five top companies who
manufacture arms and ammunition and supply it to the world are all US-based;
these include Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and General
Dynamics. These five companies together have an annual turnover of over US $180
billion.
In such a scenario, where the
strongest powers of the world sustain a major part of their economy through the
manufacturing of arms and ammunition, to imagine a future in South Asia which
is peaceful and steers more with dialogue is rather difficult. That, too, in a
political situation where, in the neighbourhood as well as in India, the might
of the military is conjoint with the political discourse, the situation is
further going to worsen. The army commanders in India have openly been
advocating war with neighbours. The situation is similar in the neighbourhood,
where the intertwining of politics and military is strong.
On the 71st Republic Day, when
the citizens are trying to reclaim what is 'India' and the material and
spiritual aspect of the nation that was consolidated with the adoption of the
Constitution, there are efforts to belittle this very Constitution by the
ruling powers. Along with the material growth of India, that is witnessing a
huge fall in the recent years – with a fall in GDP, fall in investments and
high unemployment rate, the spiritual growth in India is also witnessing a
massive fall in its ethos. The ethos of brotherhood, liberty, fraternity,
secularism, etc.
Hence, in the given situation, where both the material
and spiritual growth of the nation is facing decadence, one of the ways to
exhibit its superiority is through military might. In such a situation, to
expect what the bureaucrat whispered in my ears, "military prowess would be a
relic of the past", is not just too naïve but utterly utopian!
