CENTRE for POLICY ANALYSIS

CENTRE for POLICY ANALYSIS

“Social progress can be measured by the social position of the female sex” - Karl Marx

OPINION


The Global Debate on COVID-19 Lockdown: Listen to Divergent Scientific Voices or Risk Manipulation by Big Businesses?


At a time when the debate on lockdown and extension of lockdown is escalating not just in India but in several other countries, it is useful to examine the opinion of some very senior scientists on this issue.

Dr Sucharit Bhakdi, a highly cited scientist who headed the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene in Germany, has sent an open letter to Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany, calling for urgent re-examination of the country's response to Covid-19. He said that it was difficult to find scientific rationale for the very sweeping measures that have been taken, more in panic than on the basis of studies which firmly establish very high risks. The risk has been inflated by mistakes such as assuming that the cause of death was Covid-19 if Novel Coronavirus is found in a sample taken from a deceased person.

Earlier, he had stated in a more global context that some of the anti-Covid-19 measures are "grotesque, absurd and very dangerous". The life expectancy of millions is being shortened, he had said, while there was a "horrifying" impact on the world's economy. "The consequences on medical care are profound. Already services to patients in need are reduced, operations cancelled, practices empty, hospital personnel dwindling," he said.  

Dr Bhakdi is certainly not alone. Many eminent colleagues of his from the scientific and medical community are recording their opposition to the prevailing response of strict lockdowns to combat the spread of Covid-19, the disease caused by the Novel Coronavirus. Their combined voices are attracting growing attention, not just because they are academically accomplished and public spirited, but also because a lot of people sincerely feel that a diversity of views are required if  the best policy options are to be adopted by nations and the world.

On 20 March, Dr David Katz, founder-director of the Yale University Prevention Research Centre wrote in the New York Times that he is "deeply concerned that the social, economic and public health consequences of this near total meltdown of normal life-schools and businesses closed, gatherings banned-will be long-lasting and calamitous, possibly graver than the direct toll of the virus itself… The unemployment, impoverishment and despair likely to result will be public health scourges of the first order." 

If such apprehensions are expressed by activists, who have a firm grasp of the reality at the grass-roots level, they are criticised strongly by authorities for being unscientific. Therefore, it is really important that eminent concerned scientists have issued these warnings. Some are also suggesting alternative responses to the challenges posed by the pandemic. Michel T Osterholm, director of the Centre for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota wrote in the Washington Post on March 21 that if the effects of shutting down and making people unemployed is taken into account, then "the likely result would be not just depression but a complete breakdown…" The best alternative, he wrote, until natural immunity or a vaccine show up, is probably to let those who are at low risk to face serious symptoms of the disease work, including in the manufacturing sector, while "advising higher risk individuals to protect themselves through physical distancing and ramping up our healthcare capacity as aggressively as possible. With this battle plan we could gradually build up immunity without destroying the financial structure on which our lives are based." 

Similarly, Frank Ulrich Montgomery, a doctor and former president of the German Medical Association has said that he is "not a fan" of lockdowns. Anyone who imposes one, he has said, must say when and how its effects will be reversed, he feels, especially since "we have to assume that the virus will be with us for a  long time," he has said.

This is a question that would be haunting Indian policy-makers too, for there are already demands to revoke the clampdown, which, while controlling the spread of Covid-19, has also brought economic activities to a sudden halt. There are pay cuts on the horizon, and jobs have been lost already, and predictions are of the situation turning more grim if this continues.

In this context, the words of Dr Leonid Eidelman, former President of the World Medical Association, gain special relevance. A complete lockdown would cause more harm than good and will be counterproductive, he has said. If the economy is disrupted then, inevitably, resources for healthcare will also fall and health systems will suffer, not improve, as a result.

A physician specialising in pulmonology and a former chairman of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE), Wolfgang Wodarg has also said " What is missing just now is a rational way of looking at things. How did you find out this virus was (so) dangerous?" 

The reason experts are questioning the response to Covid-19 is that the mortality from other illnesses is far higher than for this virus. For instance, until late 2017, the WHO estimated, seasonal influenza was associated with a total of 2,50,000 to 5,00,000 annual deaths worldwide. Other estimates say the mortality is higher, at 2,90,000 to 6,50,000 deaths, even when accounted for conservatively. Imagine an annual global mortality from influenza of around half a million. Now imagine if these seasonal  deaths were played on TV on a daily or hourly basis. That would amount to reporting about over 1,000 deaths a day-more in some months of the year. Now imagine the kind of scare that could be generated from such coverage. This is why there needs to be caution about how public opinion can be manipulated in how a health issue is talked about.

Dr. John Loannidis, a professor of medicine and epidemiology and population health at Stanford University School of Medicine, who has held some very senior positions as well, has said that in the United States alone seasonal influenza kills an estimated 22,000 to 55,000 people, of a total affected population ranging from 36 and 51 million. He put his apprehension on the record on March 17 in STAT News, when he said that if we had not known about a new virus, and had not checked individuals with PCR tests, the number of total deaths due to an 'influenza-like illness' would not have seemed unusual at this time in the year. "At most we might have casually noted that flu this year seems to be a bit worse than average," he said. He has also called the oft-mentioned 3.4% global average fatality rate for Covid-19 "meaningless", on account of the severe limitations of existing available data. His own estimate says that the fatality rate for the US could likely range from 0.05 and 1%.

Many other scientists have pointed out that the fatality rates for Covid-19 are likely to be lower than the prevailing rates we hear of now. The reason is, as mentioned earlier, the discovery of this virus in the dead, particularly among the elderly who suffered from other serious ailments. As Dr Jason Oke of the University of Oxford has written, "Dying with the disease (association) is not the same as dying from the disease (causation)." 

Michel Chossudovsky, a professor emeritus of economics at the University of Ottawa and founder-director of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG), who has advised several governments and international organisations,  has pointed out in a review of the 2009 H1N1 swine flu pandemic that very exaggerated number of infections and deaths came from powerful organisations and individuals, promoting the use of millions of vaccines manufactured by multinational companies. Millions of vaccines had to be destroyed as they ended up not being necessary. Senior scientists are pointing out that this pandemic has led to a huge misallocation of scarce health funds.

Chossudovsky has also drawn attention to the growing power of vaccine-producing multinationals and global networks. He has also drawn attention to the ID2020 Agenda, described by  Peter Koenig as "an electronic program that uses generalized vaccination as a platform for digital identity." Chossudovsky adds, "ID2020...if applied, would roll out the contours of what some analysts have described as a Global Police State encompassing through vaccination the personal details of several billion people worldwide." 

While vaccination plays a critical health role, any attempts to concentrate vaccination in the hands of very big business interests would open up this sector to manipulation by them, and this should be resisted. Health activists have been pointing this out for several years.  

CRG researchers have pointed out a simulation of a Coronavirus epidemic organised in October 2019 in Baltimore, which invoked a frightfully large number of deaths, until a vaccine appears. Speaking of the future, many researchers say that instead of placing our fate and health in the hands of highly-centralised big business interests, we should rationally examine a range of treatments being suggested and tested by independent scientists who are free of the domination of big business interests. Not just medicine, but vaccine development is also possible outside the confines of big business if developing countries pool their scientific talent and resources and work on a no-profit, no-patent, basis while freely disseminating knowledge to benefit all humanity, including the poorest.

On critical health issues like the Covid-19 crisis, India and the world should be careful not to get manipulated by big business. For this reason, it is essential to protect the independence of scientists, other experts as well as communicators. It is very harmful for democracy and to the search for the best policy  options if dissenting voices and divergences, particularly those opposing manipulation by corporate interests, are stifled.   As the world grapples with Covid-19 and the debate on lockdowns rages on, it is clear that a balanced response-combining essential medical precautions with the need to protect lives, livelihoods and food security-is what we need. Scientists are opposed to prolonged draconian shut-downs and experts are saying these could prove counterproductive. They must be heard out patiently.   The writer is an independent journalist and author, convener of Save the Earth Now Campaign and author of Planet in Peril, Protecting Earth for Children and Man Over Machine. The views are personal.    

OPINION

  • River in a 'Court of Law' - Legal issues pertaining to its personality
  • Syria: A Testament To International Moral Bankruptcy
  • When the State Sought to Muzzle Privacy, U-Turn Now Only to Accommodate SC Verdict
  • The Bull in A China Shop Wrecks Indian Economy
  • When Buddha Looks The Other Way: The Plight Of The Rohingya
  • A Fatal Blow to The Judiciary
  • The Dramatic Rise in Wealth Inequality
  • Wild And Baseless Speculations of Crisis in the CPI(M)
  • Budget 2018: Fantabulous Schemes With Not A Paisa Earmarked
  • Kasganj: Sankalp Foundation and the Politics of Hate
  • PM Modi Sounds the Election Bugle: Congress and Hindutva the Agenda for 2019 Polls
  • The US Game Plan in Syria
  • Both Nehru and Patel Were the Need of the Hour in 1947-48
  • The Battle of the Two Begums of Bangladesh
  • Why Bangladesh Matters
  • Kejriwal's Apology is Not What the Media Claims
  • Arrest of a '5-minute Dalits' Proves Why SC/ST Act Dilution Will Grossly Impact Real Dalits
  • The Dalits and the Law
  • Winners May Be Losers In Karnataka's Catch 22 Endgame
  • Jinnah and the BJP
  • Jawaharlal Nehru (Nov 14 1889- May 27, 1964): We Still Live In A House That Nehru Built
  • Implications of Trump-Kim Summit: Nuclear Pays!
  • Thomas Reuters Foundation Survey: Measuring Safety, Generating Outrage
  • ROADMAP TO A CEASEFIRE: AFGN - PAK
  • What Are People Voting for?
  • Foreign Policy: A Double Whammy Awaits India
  • Changing Discourse
  • Assam: The Mythology of "Immigrants"
  • Imran Time is Here
  • 71 Years on, Forsty Relations Countinue
  • To Stop Climate Change, We Need to Open Bordera
  • Make Use of Bid to Postpone Provincial Elections
  • Cringing and Fuddled at 71
  • Ensuring Strident Voice Will Not Become Majority Voice
  • Nehru, Vajpayee and Modi
  • Religious Bias Okayed
  • The Oslo Accords: A Bloody Legacy of Betrayal
  • Crushing the Campus
  • Three Stories And Task of The Office Of Missing Person
  • Drama Over Indo-Pak Meeting
  • An ill Wind
  • Symbolic Actions Alone Are Insufficient For Long Term Change To Occur
  • If Democracy Subverts Itself
  • Returning Land to Civilians is a Promise That Needs Follow Up
  • Democracy In Crisis: What we Know and What we Don't
  • Reparations Office Can Bind The Nations Together
  • Implementation Challenges Facing The Ayushman Bharat Program
  • Subverting the Central Bank
  • Under the Yoke of New-Imperialism: A Fake War of Patriotism and Treason
  • India Joins the Club
  • The Third Phase
  • President is Best Situated to Resolve Political Crisis
  • No Country for Adventure: Challenges Extreme Sports Athletes Face in India
  • Setting A Perilous Political Precedent
  • What Rahul and Modi can do in the Next Four Months
  • Finding a Win-Win Solution to Break the Deadlock
  • Temple in the Age of Colliders
  • Four Parameters of a Political Solution at This Time
  • Resolve National Question With President's Support
  • Decapitating the Leadership
  • Four Takeaways From the 2018 Election
  • Science of Words
  • The Ace up Modi's Sleeve
  • The Government Must Not Deny The TNA
  • The Prolonged Wait For Justice And For Political Leadership
  • Endgame in Afghanistan
  • Pluralist Ethos is More Relevant to National Identity
  • A Concerned Citizen's Points For Inclusion in The Manifesto of Political Parties
  • In My Own Voice: Circle of Unreason
  • RBI To The Rescue of Modi Government - It's Election Time!
  • Say No to War
  • A terrifying Fallout
  • The Type of Leadership The Country Needs
  • Death Wish as Nationalism
  • Politics on Kashmir Need Not be About Optics Alone
  • Why an Urban Job Guarantee Scheme is Not a Bad Idea
  • National Security: The New in 'New Normal'
  • Re-Promulgating an Ordinance is a Fraud on the Constitution
  • Elections 2019: India at a Crossroads
  • Peace and Inclusive Development
  • NYAY Providing Basic Income Fulfills the Vision of Mahatma Gandhi and Changed Election Narrative Based on Basic Issues
  • Advani Should Blame Himself For Promoting Modi
  • Kashmir: Tracing the Degeneration of Mainstream Politics
  • Elections and the Issue of Civil Liberties
  • Jumlanomics:Chronicles of a Post-Truth Bharat
  • BJP: Hiding Failures, Targeting Nehru
  • A Mayawati Moment
  • Godse is a Synonym of Hindu Nationalism, Agenda of the RSS Combine!
  • Development Beyond Numbers
  • A Rational Approach to Countering Extremist Violence is Needed
  • In My Own Voice: Is This the Sprit of Democracy?
  • Prevention is The Best Migration Cure
  • The Rise of Hate
  • The Right Mantras for India's Change
  • Coming Home - Where Family Overpowers All
  • Easter Sunday Bombing Used to Create a Major Rift in Sri Lankan Society
  • Hacking Humanity
  • Environmental Rule of Law in India
  • Peace is a Word That West Has Taken From Afghans
  • Trump's War Games
  • Modi & States
  • Who is an 'Outsider' in West Bengal?
  • China on Maps
  • 19th Amendment Will Correct Itself at End of President's Current Term
  • Authoritarianism and the Crisis of Public Ethics in India
  • Presidential Candidate The People Want
  • Has India's Kashmir Cape Given Pakistan Reason for War?
  • Icons and Ideology of Religious Nationalism
  • Why NRC in Assam May Create Another Kashmir
  • Campaign to Abolish the Executive Presidency in Sri Lanka is a Red Herring
  • As US Tries to Isolate Iran, China Steps In
  • Of Hindi and Hierarchy
  • Why Sri Lankan Elections May Bring Far Reaching Change
  • What US Policy Tells Us About India's Growing 'Friendship' With It
  • Gandhian Philosophy is a Critique of Modernity and Power
  • Inner Party Democracy is Just as Important as Funding
  • India's Foreign Policy Has Dug Itself a Deep Hole
  • 'Broken Promises' and Politics of Hate': Is Political Autonomy The Way Forward For J&K?
  • The Ninth Betrayal: America Has Let Down Khurd, Yet Again
  • Who Benefits From The WhatsApp Hacking Case?: Pertinent Question Left Unanswered
  • State Elections Results Expose "Limits" of BJP's Nationalist Agenda
  • "Religious Belief" vs. "Rule of Law": Did SC's Ayodhya Verdict Legalise Building of a Theocratic State?
  • What Does Trump's "New Refugee Ban" Mean for America's Immigrants?
  • India Must Change Course as Rajapaksas Return on Sinhala Buddhist Wave
  • The Supreme Court's First Judgment Without an Author
  • Geopolitics in South Asia Renders Millions Stateless
  • "Shakespeare's Vision of the Improbale" Unfolds: Is Modi Today's Macbeth?
  • Sri Lanka Under Rajapaksa: Finding Areas of Mutual Agreement
  • "The Game of Religion is Played by Men": Women Speak From the Margins of Ayodhya Dispute
  • Telangana Ecounter- Failure of Local Police Poses Grave Danger to Democracy
  • The Changing Nature of War and Diplomacy
  • Sri Lanka: Government's Cooperation A "Temporary Phenomenon"?
  • The Role of Corruption in This Season of Revolts
  • New Citizenship Law to a "Brazenly Divisive Agenda"
  • Youth Agitation Against CAA Brings a Historic Generational Shift
  • "Digital Authoritarianism": With Internet Shutdowns Normalised, the Digital Space is Democracy's New Battleground
  • Sri Lanka: The Challenge of Development Amidst Devolution of Power
  • The Political Divides that Split India
  • 'Never Again': Echoes of Nazi Crimes Remain Alive 75 Years After Auschwitz
  • "Legacy of Mutual Suspicion" Plagues Opponents of the Modi Regime
  • "Toxic" India Sliding into an Environmental Abyss
  • Manufacturing Hate: From Anurag Thakur's 'Shoot the Traitors' to Pistol-Bearing Youth's 'Yeh lo Azaadi!'
  • Kejriwal Isn't Communal, But His Desire Not to be Seen Anti-Hindu May Prove Self-Defeating
  • Religion States Won't Oppose US-Taliban Deal
  • Lessons From Pathogens: Coronavirus, A wake Up Call?
  • The Geopolitics of the Covid 19 Pandemic
  • Cold War Begins As Nations Fued Over Coronavirus
  • India Fights Coronavirus...With Scriptures, Morals and Police
  • The Burden of COVID 19
  • Do Israeli Settelemnts in Occupies West Bank Constitute a War Crime ?
  • The Global Debate on COVID-19 Lockdown: Listen to Divergent Scientific Voices or Risk Manipulation by Big Businesses?
  • Sri Lanka's Easter Bombings And The Demand For Justice
  • How India Can Solve the "Catch-22 Situation" of Allowing Migrant Workers to Return Home
  • The Time for Universal Basic Income Has Arrived
  • COVID-19 Crisis Exposes Fatal Weaknesses of 'Strong' Leaders
  • The Pandemic Has Taught Us the Importance of Maintaining an Ecological Balance, Will we Remember IT?
  • The Muslim Elite Has Let Down the Muslim Poor
  • "There is Nothing Nationalist or Non-Nationalist in Reporting"
  • Why WHO Took 3 Months to Declare a Global Pandemic
  • A Political Lockdown That Silences Voices
  • The 'Relief Package' of Online Education May End up "Institutionalising Drop Outs"
  • Can Democracy Survive the Coronavirus?
  • As China Ups the Ante, This is What India Must do...
  • Tackling Racism With Compassionate Reporting-CNN Leads The Way
  • Sri Lanka: Pluralism In Governance Required In The Absence of Parliament
  • Idia's Tactical Non-Solutions To China's Incursions in Ladakh
  • "At The Brink of A New Cold War": Sino-US Ties at a Crossroads
  • In Light of Rising Conservatism, Can The Personal be Political Again?
  • India-China: The Complete Breakdown of Trust, How and Why
  • Rethinking Development After Covid-19
  • The Pandemic Must Transform Our Agriculture
  • Treacherous Road to Make Manu History
  • The 'American Way of War' Is Built On A Foundation of Racism
  • Covid -19 And The Crisis of Education-An Insight
  • Governments That Preach Non-Violence Must Lead By Example
  • New Status of Hagia Sophia Signals The Death Of Secularism
  • Covid 19 and Furthering of Sectarian Agenda in Education
  • Biden's "Conventional" Approach vs Trump's "Whimsical" Handling of Foreign Policy
  • Why Arguments Against Reservation are Flawed
  • Curfew Welcomes One Year of Abrogations in Kashmir
  • Ayodha: What is BJP's Motive For Holding Ram Temple Ceremony Amid Pandemic?
  • New Education Policies of India And Pakistan Will Further Divide, Within and Without
  • Does India's Handling of China Make Sense?
  • Return of the Rajapaksas in Sri Lanka
  • An Independent Supreme Court Is a Must for Democracy
  • Does Rule of Law Trump Tide of Public Opinion?
  • UAE-Israel Deal Accelerating Fragmentation of West Asian Politics
  • Congress And Its "Unprecedented Political Challenge""
  • Does The 20th Amendment Threaten Pluralism in Sri Lanka?
  • Digital Hate, Now A Profitable Commodity
  •